Legal Opinion
Summit Technology, Inc. v. High-Line Medical Instruments, Co.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 16, 1996No. CV 95-6491 ABC (SHx)PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT .
COLLINS, District Judge.
Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint came on regularly for hearing before this Court on July 15, 1996. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. Procedural Background
On September 28,1995, Plaintiff SUMMIT TECHNOLOGY, INC. (“Summit”) filed a Complaint against Defendants HIGH-LINE MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS COMPANY, INC., d/b/a HI-LINE MEDICAL…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Farm Raised Salmon CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Anunziato v. eMachines, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- PhotoMedex, Inc. v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Cottrell, Ltd. v. Biotrol International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.