Summit Technology, Inc. v. High-Line Medical Instruments Co.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
COLLINS, District Judge.
Defendants’ motions to dismiss came on regularly for hearing before this Court on February 5,1996. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motions are GRANTED.
I. Background
This case concerns a dispute over the use and distribution of “excimer” laser devices used by opthamologists in laser eye surgery. Plaintiff SUMMIT TECHNOLOGY, INC. (“Summit”) is a Massachusetts corporation that develops, manufactures, sells, and services laser systems…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Robert Perez v. Nidek Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Enesco Corporation, an Ohio Corporation Precious Moments, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation v. Price/costco Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- PhotoMedex, Inc. v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Summit Technology, Inc. v. High-Line Medical Instruments, Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1996
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.