Legal Opinion

Borromeo v. Shea

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 30, 2007No. 58221-6-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 This case raises another question about rules of the road for drivers and bicyclists. Here, the bicyclist was riding in a bike lane, but in the direction opposed to the flow of traffic. He was injured when he was hit by a car turning onto the roadway from a parking lot. The jury found the driver not negligent.

Ellington, J.

¶2 The court instructed the jury as to the duties of both driver and cyclist under the statutes. As pertains to bicyclists, the statutes are not a model of clarity. But the instructions were proper, and the evidence supports the verdict. We therefore affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶3…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. Microsoft Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Davis v. Microsoft Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Gammon v. Clark Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Samuelson v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Pudmaroff v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API