Legal Opinion

Davis v. Microsoft Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2003No. 72250-1PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

70 P.3d 126 (2003)

149 Wash.2d 521

Thomas DAVIS, Petitioner,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, Respondent.

No. 72250-1.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued October 17, 2002.

Decided June 5, 2003.

O'Shea Barnard Martin, David Hasbrook, Bellevue, for Petitioner.

Preston Gates & Ellis, Thomas Kelly, Paul Lawrence, Matthew Segal, Jonathan Harrison, Seattle, Preston Gates & Ellis, Donna Mezias, San Francisco, for Respondent.

Mary Roberts, Seattle, Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Wa. Employment Lawyers Ass'n.

OWENS, J.

Thomas Davis sued his employer, Microsoft Corporation, alleging…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Mary M. Tyndall v. National Education Centers, Incorporated of California, T/a Kee Business College Campus National Education Centers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  5. Lorraine Beck v. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and Chancellor John SchroederCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Alejandre v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. McClarty v. Totem Elec.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. McClarty v. Totem ElectricWashington Supreme Court · 2006

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API