Godlin v. Hockett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Vice Chief Justice.
The factual situation (pleadings and contentions of the parties) may be briefly summarized as follows: That plaintiff in error, Louis Godlin, is the owner of land known as Crutcho Park Addition and said land abuts Crutcho Creek upstream from *390the land of defendants in error, Banny W. Hockett and Marian E. Hockett, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs and defendant. Plaintiffs alleged that defendant built a dam, dike or levee along the roadway which abuts their property, changing the natural flow of the watercourse, resulting in damage to their property. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Town of Jefferson v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Garrett v. HaworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HadleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Hatmaker v. GripeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.