Legal Opinion

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Hadley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 5, 1934No. 21903PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff filed his action against the defendant company September 25, 1929, and in his petition substantially alleged he was the owner of 36 acres of land on the north bank of the South Canadian river where defendant’s railway crosses on a bridge immediately west of said land, and that defendant had erected and maintained along the south bank and west of the bridge a dike or embankment which is permanent in character, thereby changing the channel and flow of water out of their natural course and direction, over and across plaintiff’s land, which was done by the defendant negligently,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Savannah, Americus & Montgomery Railway v. BufordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Gray v. McWilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Town of Jefferson v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Garrett v. HaworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. City of Tucson v. Apache MotorsArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Franco-American Charolaise, Ltd. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Lowden v. BoslerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API