Legal Opinion

Waerness v. Independent Order of Foresters

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 2, 1927No. Gen. No. 31,423PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

The defendant is a fraternal insurance order organized under the laws of the Dominion of Canada. Plaintiff sued in assumpsit as beneficiary of a life insurance policy issued by it to her deceased husband, Henry T. Waerness.

There was a plea of the general issue and a stipulation that defendant might, without filing a special plea, offer evidence tending to show that at the time of death deceased was not a member in good standing of the. defendant order.

At the close of all the evidence each party moved for an instruction which was denied, the jury returned a verdict for ,the plaintiff assessing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. High Court Independent Order of Foresters v. SchweitzerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Chicago Life Insurance v. WarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Daly v. Sumpter Drug Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Illinois Life Ass'n v. WellsIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Dromgold v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  2. Routa v. Royal LeagueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  3. Stevenson v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. Blair v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API