Legal Opinion

Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co. v. Coverdale

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 7, 1935No. 33154PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ODOM, Justice.

Act No. 6 of 1932 (section 1) requires of all persons, firms, or corporations engaged in the business of manufacturing, generating, or selling electricity for heat, light, or power in this state, and engaged in certain other businesses, to pay an excise or license tax. Section 6 of the act provides that if such tax is not paid, the supervisor of public accounts shall make and cause to be recorded in the mortgage records of the parish, where such person, firm, or corporation is engaged in such business or occupation, a statement under oath showing the amount of the tax due,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coleman v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1861
  2. Police Jury v. MichelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1849
  3. Donnell v. ParrottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
  4. State ex rel. Gaynor v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
  5. Gondran v. Nelson Co-op. Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Baton Rouge Bank & Trust CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co. v. CoverdaleDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1937
  3. Toms v. NugentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co. v. CoverdaleDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API