Legal Opinion

Donnell v. Parrott

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1858PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Fourth District Court of New Orleans, Price, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

The plaintiff, Donnell, sued defendants, at their domicil in the parish of St. Landry, for a debt alleged to be due for plantation supplies.

Donnell was then, and now, a resident of New Orleans.

He claimed then $586 53, with interest.

Wm. H. Parrot answered by a general denial. His wife filed a separate answer, averring that she owed Donnell nothing, but that .he was indebted to her in a large amount, which she plead in reconvention.

When the cause came on for trial before the court in St.-Landry, the plaintiff, Donnell, moved to discontinue, and the court awarded judgment, dismissing the cause…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co. v. CoverdaleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. San-I-Baker Corporation v. MagendieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. Bank of West Feliciana v. ClackSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  4. Carre v. International Car Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  5. Brantley v. PruittSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API