Legal Opinion
Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co. v. Coverdale
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided May 24, 1937No. 615PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWKINS, District Judge.
The issues in this case have been stated in opinions heretofore handed down on the application for preliminary injunction.
On the original hearing a preliminary writ was granted on the finding that the statute assailed violated provisions of both the State and Federal Constitutions. Shortly thereafter, the State Supreme Court (181 La. 117, 158 So. 640) sustained its constitutionality under the state law and a rehearing was promptly granted by this court. On the rehearing a preliminary injunction was issued for the reason we concluded the act in question infringed the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Associated Press v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coverdale v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- Arnold v. Postmaster GeneralDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987