Hammond v. Hibbler
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer, J. Bill by Edward P. Hammond and others against Prank B. Hibbler to enjoin defendant from conducting the sale of intoxicating liquors contrary to the terms of a written lease. Prom a decree for complainants, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtOstbandee, C. J.
The material facts are that in the year 1906 complainants leased certain premises in the city of Detroit for a period of 10 years to Charles Hinkle and Allan Nowlin. The lessees, under a permissive clause in the lease, assigned it to the Hinkle-Nowlin Company, a corporation. There were two buildings upon the property, now known, respectively, as the Gayety Theater and the Hotel Harrington. In 1907 the assignee of the lessees leased the hotel to James W. Harrington for the balance of the term. In and by the original lease, it was agreed “that no building or part thereof be sublet for or used…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Watrous v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Smith v. BarrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Chippewa Lumber Co. v. TremperMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Wertheimer v. HosmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Jenks v. PawlowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baxter v. OgooshevitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Teagan v. KeywellMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Central Land Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1942