Legal Opinion

Smith v. Barrie

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1885PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Otsego. (Emerick, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, O. J.

This case has once before been in this-Court, and is reported under the title of Barrie v. Smith, 47 Mich. 130. The suit is brought to take advantage of the breach of a condition subsequent contained in a deed from the plaintiffs, Smith, Kelly and Dwight to Albert M. Hilton and Hamilton Turner, of lot 5 block 21 of the village of Otsego Lake bearing date June 10, 1879. The condition is as follows:

“ Provided always, and this conveyance and the estate in said premises hereby created is subject to the express condition, that if the said parties of the second part, their heirs or…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Cowell v. Springs Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Mandlebaum v. McDonellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Blanchard v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Gibert v. . PetelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. Linzee v. MixerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Central National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Watrous v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ferris v. American Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Epworth Assembly v. Ludington & Northern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Clark v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API