Legal Opinion

Farwell v. Keaton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1976No. 55696, (Calendar No. 2)PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

There is ample evidence to support the jury determination that David Siegrist failed to exercise reasonable care after voluntarily coming to the aid of Richard Farwell and that his negligence was the proximate cause of Farwell’s death. We are also of the opinion that Siegrist, who was with Farwell the evening he was fatally injured and, as the jury found, knew or should have known of his peril, had an affirmative duty to come to Farwell’s aid. 1

I

On the evening of August 26, 1966, Siegrist and Farwell drove to a trailer rental lot to return an automobile which Siegrist had borrowed from a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Clark v. DalmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Yania v. BiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Davis v. ThorntonMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Fisher v. Johnson Milk Co., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Depue v. FlatauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. Miami Development Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jackson v. City of JolietCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Smith v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. McGee by and Through McGee v. ChalfantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Dawe v. Dr Reuven Bar-Levav & Associates, PcMichigan Supreme Court · 2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API