Legal Opinion
Maurer v. King
California Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1899No. S.F. No. 1754PublishedCited by 8 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. John Ellsworth, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from the judgment, and the contention is that the findings do not support the judgment.
The court found all the facts substantially as they are set out in the complaint and that all the denials and allegations in the answer are untrue, and rendered judgment for defendant.
On the 8th of February, A. D. 1895, one J. W. Smith, for a valuable consideration, executed and delivered to plaintiff the following instrument in writing:
“At settlement this eighth day of February, 1895, at Oakland, Cal., and at which time I have purchased George H. Maurer’s interest in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sheehy v. ShinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Cashman v. RootCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kullman v. SimmensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Porter v. Plymouth Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Berger v. O'HEARNCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Fox v. DehnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- First Securities Co. v. American Hecolite Denture Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.