Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. Phillips

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1943No. 10234PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Appellees are co-owners, in trust, of Day reissue patent number 18,755. They brought this action in the District Court for infringement of claims 3, 4, 5 and 6 thereof, and the court, holding the patent valid and infringed, gayp its interlocutory decree enjoining further infringement and ordering an accounting. On this appeal from that decree both validity and infringement of the patent are in issue.

The patent in suit is for a means of precooling railway refrigerator cars. The standard refrigerator car is cooled by ice contained in the ice bunkers at either end of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Concrete Appliances Co. v. GomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Railroad Supply Co. v. Elyria Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Celite Corporation v. Dicalite Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hall v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Lane-Wells Co. v. M. O. Johnston Oil Field Service Corporation. M. O. Johnston Oil Field Service Corporation v. Lane-Wells CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. De Cew v. Union Bag & Paper CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1944
  4. Samuel S. Otis v. National Tea CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  5. Swenson v. BoosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API