Legal Opinion

Grigsby v. May

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1892No. 3124PublishedCited by 31 opinions

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. Different branches of this suit have been in this court. See Peak v. Swindle, 68 Texas, 242; Grigsby v. Peak, Id., 235; Grigsby v. Peak, 57 Texas, 142; Caruth v. Grigsby, Id., 259; and Grigsby v. Caruth, Id., 269.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

— This action was originally brought by D. B. Grigsby and Maria Louisa Swindle, on August 18, 1874, against between three and four hundred defendants, one of whom was B. F. Aspley, to recover the community interest of their mother in the John Grigsby league and labor of land, and in a survey of 640 acres of land granted by virtue of a certificate issued to James A. Sylvester.

Plaintiffs tendered to the several defendants who asserted claim to particular tracts of land in either of the grants the right to a severance, and Mrs. Mary A. May, who claimed 290 acres, described…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burleson v. BurlesonTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Veramendi v. HutchinsTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Thompson v. CraggTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Blum v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Grigsby v. PeakTexas Supreme Court · 1882

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Burnham v. Hardy Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Baldwin v. RootTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Eckert v. WendelTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Cagle v. Sabine Valley Timber & Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Cole v. GrigsbyTexas Supreme Court · 1896

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API