Grigsby v. Peak

Bonner, Associate Justice.

The court below held—- and correctly, as decided by this court during the present term, in a branch of this same case, William Caruth v. D. B. Grigsby — that the title of appellants and plaintiffs below, Maria Louisa Swindle and Daniel B. Grigsby, was superior to that of appellee and defendant below, Jefferson Peak, unless defeated by the statute of limitations as to appellant Maria Louisa, and by estoppel as to appellant Grigsby. The jury were then charged as to her upon the question of limitations, and as to him upon that of estoppel.

The first and second assigned…