Underwood v. Zurich Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
In this worker’s compensation appeal, we are asked to determine whether a post-trial increase in disability constitutes a reason justifying relief from a final judgment under Tenn.R.Civ.P. Rule 60.02(5). The trial court awarded 58 percent disability to the body as a result of work-connected injuries caused by an explosion, and thereafter commuted the award to a lump sum. Later, the employee petitioned to reopen the lump-sum judgment because Post-traumatic Stress Disorder was diagnosed after the final judgment and that constituted grounds to reopen under Tenn.R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Toney v. Mueller Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Banks v. Dement Const. Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Nails v. Aetna Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Corby v. MatthewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- BOLES, BY & THROUGH BOLES v. Hooper & McDonald, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Henry v. GoinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- Henderson v. SAIA, INC.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- McCracken v. Brentwood United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
- Wilhelm v. KrogersTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Federated Insurance Co. v. LethcoeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.