Legal Opinion

Underwood v. Zurich Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1993PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

In this worker’s compensation appeal, we are asked to determine whether a post-trial increase in disability constitutes a reason justifying relief from a final judgment under Tenn.R.Civ.P. Rule 60.02(5). The trial court awarded 58 percent disability to the body as a result of work-connected injuries caused by an explosion, and thereafter commuted the award to a lump sum. Later, the employee petitioned to reopen the lump-sum judgment because Post-traumatic Stress Disorder was diagnosed after the final judgment and that constituted grounds to reopen under Tenn.R.Civ.P.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Toney v. Mueller Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Banks v. Dement Const. Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Nails v. Aetna Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Corby v. MatthewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  5. BOLES, BY & THROUGH BOLES v. Hooper & McDonald, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Henry v. GoinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Henderson v. SAIA, INC.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. McCracken v. Brentwood United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. Wilhelm v. KrogersTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Federated Insurance Co. v. LethcoeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API