Legal Opinion

Banks v. Dement Const. Co., Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1991PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Chief Justice.

This workers’ compensation case presents an appeal, pursuant to Rule 9, Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure, by the employer from the judgment of the trial court granting the employee’s motion, pursuant to Rule 60.02(5), Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure (T.R.Civ.P.), to set aside an order dismissing the employee’s complaint. The basis on which the court relieved the employee from the final judgment is found to be legally insufficient, requiring that the judgment be reversed.

The dates on which the pleadings and orders were filed are significant. On April 2,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. Pneumo Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  2. Jerkins v. McKinneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Toney v. Mueller Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Thompson v. Firemen's Fund Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Travis v. City of MurfreesboroTennessee Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Henry v. GoinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Henderson v. SAIA, INC.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Underwood v. Zurich Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  5. McCracken v. Brentwood United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API