Legal Opinion

Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This was a proceeding by the city of Chicago, for the extension and opening of Chauncey avenue across the rights of way of the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company and the Pittsburg, Ft. Wayne and Chicago Railway Company. Chauncey avenue is a street 66 feet in width, running north and south, and when extended, will cross the right of way of the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company at the point where it is already crossed by Seventy-sixth street, a street 80 feet in width, and running east and west. The right of way of the last named railway company, the only one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Joliet, Lockport & Aurora Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Reed v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Harwood v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. ShelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. City of PontiacIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. City of NapervilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. RhodesIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of MorrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API