New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Rhodes
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Allen Circuit Court; E. O’Rourke, Judge. Highway proceeding by Elmer E. Rhodes and others, against which the New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Company and others remonstrate. ' Prom a judgment for .petitioners, remonstrants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.
Appellees filed a petition for the location and opening of a public highway across the right of way of appellant company and the lands of other persons. Viewers were appointed, who reported in favor of the opening of said highway. Appellants filed a remonstrance against the public utility of said highway and for damages. Reviewers were appointed who reported in favor of the public utility of the proposed highway and against appellants’ claim for damages. Prom the judgment of the board'of commissioners establishing said highway, appellants appealed to the court below, where the proceeding was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Thorpe v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
- The Albany Northern Railroad Company v. . BrownellNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chicago & Erie Railroad v. LuddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GreggIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Wabash Railroad v. Railroad CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Lee v. DunbarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Muncie & Portland Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.