Legal Opinion

Reed v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1888PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Gallatin county; the Hon. B. D. Youngblood, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam: This was a proceeding by appellee to condemn ten acres of land lying outside of its right of way, for the purpose of taking therefrom sand, rock, gravel and earth, for ballast, and to maintain its roadway. The petition, after averring the incorporation of petitioner, and that it has for ten years owned and operated, and is now operating, a line of railway through Gallatin county, avers that by an act of the legislature of Illinois, approved February 25, 1867, a charter was granted to the Illinois Southeastern Railway Company, by which it was authorized to build, construct, equip…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Fischer v. EslamanIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Haslam v. Galena & Southern Wisconsin R. R.Illinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. O'Hare v. Chicago, Madison & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. St. Louis & Cairo Railroad v. Postal Telegraph Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Lieberman v. Chicago & South Side Rapid Transit RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Railway Co. v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API