Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Chamberlain

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1876PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. E. S. Williams, Judge, presiding. This was a suit by John C. Chamberlain and others for the partition of certain real estate. Afterwards, a cross-bill was filed by Alphonse Hurtel and William T. Ayers, as trustees under the will of Charles P. Page, and by Charles B. Chamberlain, Hoses Waring and Caroline Goodman, in which the same relief was prayed as in the original bill.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. E. S. Williams, Judge, presiding. This was a suit by John C. Chamberlain and others for the partition of certain real estate. Afterwards, a cross-bill was filed by Alphonse Hurtel and William T. Ayers, as trustees under the will of Charles P. Page, and by Charles B. Chamberlain, Hoses Waring and Caroline Goodman, in which the same relief was prayed as in the original bill. Both the original and cross-bills sought to have declared void certain proceedings instituted by the appellant to condemn the property for railroad purposes. The court,…

1Opinion of the Court

Hr. Chief Justice Sheldon

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was a bill for partition and other relief, filed in the circuit court of Cook county by John C. Chamberlain, one of the appellees, in January, 1870. Ther lands sought to be divided are blocks 24, 25, 26, and parts of blocks 23 and 29, in the southwest quarter of the north-west quarter of section 19, in township 39 north, range 14 east, in Cook county. The bill alleges, that the whole estate was owned in the following proportions: John C. Chamberlain an undivided one-eighth; Alphonse Ilurtel and William T. Ayers, as trustees…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re WilliamNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Spring Valley Water Works v. San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Young v. LorainIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Rich v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railroad v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McEneney v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Towns v. Klamath CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. City of Chicago v. SalingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. County of Dodge v. AcomNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Calumet River Railway Co. v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API