Legal Opinion

United States v. Toombs

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2009No. 08-3278PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Following his arrest on and arraignment for various drug and firearm possession charges, defendant Mario Toombs remained incarcerated for approximately twenty-two months before his trial began. During this time period, the district court granted seven continuances under the ends-of-justice provision of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (“ends-of-justice continuances”). In a motion to dismiss, Toombs claimed the district court failed to make the requisite factual findings when it granted the ends-of-justice continuances, and therefore over…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Zedner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. United States v. Lupe GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. John Walter Castro, Sr. v. Ron WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. State v. OllivierWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. United States v. RushinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API