Legal Opinion

State v. Ollivier

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 2013No. 86633-3PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, C.J.

¶1 Brandon Ollivier contends that his rights to a speedy trial under CrR 3.3, the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and article I, section 22 of the Washington State Constitution were violated by delay in bringing him to trial. He also maintains *820that evidence obtained in a search of his apartment must be suppressed because of misrepresentations and other defects in the affidavit in support of probable cause to issue the warrant, and that CrR 2.3(d) was violated because he was not presented with a copy of the search warrant prior to commencement of the search. We conclude that…

2Cases cited116 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Scott Logan v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. IrishOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. Z.U.E.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State v. HowertonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. State Of Washington, Res/cross-app. v. George Donald Hatt, Jr., App/cross-res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API