United States v. Clark
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Richard Clark was charged and convicted of multiple counts relating to his participation in a “pump- and-dump” securities fraud scheme. Ex-erasing jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm Mr. Clark’s conviction.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
This case arises from a classic pump- and-dump scheme that was orchestrated principally by Mr. Clark’s co-defendant, George David Gordon. In a separate opinion, we recently affirmed Mr. Gordon’s convictions and sentence. See United States v. Gordon, 710 F.3d 1124 (10th Cir.2013). In doing so, we set…
2Cases cited120 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. Reginald Dargan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- United States v. Diosme Fernandez HanoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Ibarra-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.