Legal Opinion

United States v. Clark

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 18, 2013No. 10-5152PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Richard Clark was charged and convicted of multiple counts relating to his participation in a “pump- and-dump” securities fraud scheme. Ex-erasing jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm Mr. Clark’s conviction.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

This case arises from a classic pump- and-dump scheme that was orchestrated principally by Mr. Clark’s co-defendant, George David Gordon. In a separate opinion, we recently affirmed Mr. Gordon’s convictions and sentence. See United States v. Gordon, 710 F.3d 1124 (10th Cir.2013). In doing so, we set…

2Cases cited120 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. United States v. Reginald Dargan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. United States v. Diosme Fernandez HanoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Ibarra-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API