Legal Opinion

Zedner v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 5, 2006No. 05-5992PublishedCited by 448 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito

This case requires us to consider the application of the doctrines of waiver, judicial estoppel, and harmless error to a violation of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 (Speedy Trial Act or Act), 18 U. S. C. §§ 3161-3174. The Act generally requires a federal criminal trial to begin within 70 days after a defendant is charged or makes an initial appearance, § 3161(c)(1), but the Act contains a detailed scheme under which certain specified periods of delay are not counted. In this case, petitioner’s trial did not begin within 70 days of indictment. Indeed, his trial did not commence until more than…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by448 opinions

  1. United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Lynch v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. Dolan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Bloate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. United States v. Huete-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011

443 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API