Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. . McCoy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 10, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The first and third grounds of demurrer were overruled, and the only question for decision is whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It is provided by statute that damages for personal injuries or other tort sustained by a married woman may be recovered by her without the joinder of her husband; and her right to bring suit is not affected by any distinction between a negligent and a wilful wrong. C. S., 2513; Roberts v. Roberts, 185 N. C., 566; Crowell v. Crowell, 180 N. C., 516. But the specific point we are now to consider is this: Is a married woman…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crowell v. CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. Roberts v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Hood v. . SudderthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  4. Paul v. FrazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  5. Willeford v. Bailey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Breece v. JettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Magierowski v. BuckleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. McCoy v. . JusticeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Earle v. . EarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API