Hyatt v. . McCoy
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The first and third grounds of demurrer were overruled, and the only question for decision is whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It is provided by statute that damages for personal injuries or other tort sustained by a married woman may be recovered by her without the joinder of her husband; and her right to bring suit is not affected by any distinction between a negligent and a wilful wrong. C. S., 2513; Roberts v. Roberts, 185 N. C., 566; Crowell v. Crowell, 180 N. C., 516. But the specific point we are now to consider is this: Is a married woman…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crowell v. CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Roberts v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Hood v. . SudderthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Paul v. FrazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Willeford v. Bailey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Breece v. JettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Magierowski v. BuckleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- McCoy v. . JusticeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Earle v. . EarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930