Legal Opinion

Willeford v. Bailey.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 21, 1903PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Action by T. E. Williford against P. S. Bailey, beard by Judge W. 8. 0JB. Robinson and a jury, at October Term, 1902, of the Superior Oourt of Union County. From a judgment for the plaintiff the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This is an action for seduction of plaintiff’s 17 year old daughter by the defendant. The defendant noted 34 exceptions on the trial which he reduced to 28 in making out case on appeal. In the brief, upon further reflection, his counsel very properly abandoned 14 of these. Of the remaining fourteen it is only necessary to consider assignments of error Nos. 12, 21, 24, 26, and 28, for the others are without merit and need no' discussion.

No. 12 was to the admission of a deposition on the ground that the witness was a resident of the County, that no commissioner was named in the notice and no…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . BrittainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Barnhardt v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Marcom v. Raleigh & Augusta Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Hood v. . SudderthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Abbott Ex Rel. Abbott v. HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Howell v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Howell v. . HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Khalifa v. ShannonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Tillotson v. . CurrinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Bowman v. HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API