Legal Opinion

Earle v. . Earle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabksoit, J.

In the present action defendant, Robert Earle, was duly served with summons. The complaint was properly verified and filed within the time required by the statute. The court had jurisdiction of the person and the complaint alleges actionable negligence against the defendant. It is a suit of the wife against the husband for negligent injury, but it is now well settled in this jurisdiction that such an action will lie. C. S., 454, 2513; Crowell v. Crowell, 180 N. C., 516, S. c., 181 N. C., 66; Roberts v. Roberts, 185 N. C., 566; Small v. Morrison, 185 N. C., 577; In re Will of Witherington, 186…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Crowell v. CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Roberts v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Crowell v. . CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Hill v. Huffines Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shaw v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. LaChance v. Service Trucking Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  3. Sanders v. ChavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Armstrong v. . AsburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API