Legal Opinion

City of Hobart v. Dailey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 18, 1934No. 22685PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

For convenience the parties hereto will be designated plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

This action was commenced in the district court of Kiowa county, Okla., by F. A. Dailey, doing business as Ajax Construction Company, as plaintiff, against the city of Hobart, a municipal corporation, as defendant, to recover the sum of $2,588.90, together with interest alleged to be due him on a contract entered into between the parties for the construction of a sewer disposal plant and waterworks extension system for the city of Hobart. The plaintiff, in his petition, sought…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co. v. Overstreet & DockterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Foster v. West Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Rock v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. NixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Frazer v. City of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cooke v. KinkeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. GrimSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Lippert Bros. v. City of AtokaDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1950
  4. McGaw v. Master Craft HomesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Colby v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API