Legal Opinion

Frazer v. City of Ardmore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 1924No. 15050PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

FOSTER, O.

On April 11, 3923, C. E. Frazer, W. H. Wimberly, Jacob Bodovitz, and Melvina Bodovitz, for themselves and all other property owners in district No. 66 of the city of Ardmore, plaintiffs in error, sued the city of Ardmore and A. L. Cook, defendants in error, in the district court of Garter county, Okla., for "an injunction to prevent the collection of certain paving assessments levied under the provisions of ordinance No. 487 of said city, and to enjoin a certification of the assessments to the county treasurer of Carter county. The parties will hereinafter he referred to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Minnetonka Oil Co. v. Cleveland Vitrified Brick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Bowles v. Neely, MayorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Rider v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McDowell v. DrozSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Woods v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Bent Bros., Inc. v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. City of Hobart v. DaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. McGaw v. Master Craft HomesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API