Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Cooke v. Kinkead

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 1, 1936No. 27459PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OSBORN, Y. 0. J..

This action was instituted in the district court of Oklahoma county by Charles B. Cooke, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against John B. Kin-kead, and numerous other defendants, including Knox L. Garvin, in which it was sought to enjoin and restrain said Knox L. Garvin from drilling and exploring for oil and gas upon block 9, Howe’s Capitol addition to Oklahoma City, or from assigning his lease to any other person, firm, or corporation, and to enjoin the other defendants as property owners in said block from placing any oil and gas leases on record in the office of the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Moore v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Shaw v. GrumbineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Gardner v. MaffittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Wagoner Oil & Gas Co. v. MarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Bachman v. Colpaert Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Horace Case v. Arthur E. MorrisetteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Southwest Petroleum Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Hoover v. WaggomanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Martin v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. DrauverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API