Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Grim
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 25, 1938No. 28382PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an action for breach of contract. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff, Grim, and defendant appeals. The facts are as follows:
Plaintiff alleged in his petition that on or about April 15, 1935, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, defendant, through its duly authorized agent, orally employed him to represent it in matters involving disputed claims and all litigation arising therefrom in connection with the payment of guaranteed deposits in the insolvent First State Bank of Cheyenne. Plaintiff further alleged that at the time of his employment he was requested by defendant to sign,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anthis v. Sullivan Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- British American Oil Producing Co. v. Midway Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- R. v. Smith Supply Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Shuler v. VigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Cargile v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. RosamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Deboer Construction, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. Reliance Insurance Company and the Insurance Center, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Kelso v. KelsoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Texas Company v. PeacockIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.