Legal Opinion

Martien v. Porter

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1923No. 5,391PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

This is an action in equity, instituted by the plaintiff for the purpose of obtaining an injunction to restrain the defendants George P. Porter, as state auditor of the state of Montana, and O. H. Junod, as state treasurer, from paying any salaries to the members of the state board of equalization or the employees thereof, on the ground that the amendment *462to section 15 of Article XII of the state Constitution, under which said board was created, is invalid as not having been proposed and submitted to the people of the state by the extraordinary session of the seventeenth legislative assembly…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  4. People ex rel. Elder v. SoursSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  5. Constitutional Prohibitory AmendmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Chaney v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Kemp v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  3. City of Jackson v. Com'r of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. City of Raton v. SprouleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State Ex Rel. Palagi v. ReganMontana Supreme Court · 1942

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API