Legal Opinion

Blue v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 13, 1990No. 393-88LPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

This regulatory taking case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RUSCC 12(b) or alternatively, for summary judgment. Plaintiffs are co-owners of a tract of land in Escambia County, Florida (County). The land adjoins Naval Air Station Pensacola. In their amended complaint, plaintiffs allege that defendant, by its participation in passage of the Escambia County Airport Land Use Ordinance, improperly restricted use of plaintiffs’ property and thereby effected an unauthorized taking under the Fifth Amendment. Plaintiffs seek that the ordinance data…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Applegate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  2. Gavin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Persyn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  4. Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  5. Persyn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API