Legal Opinion
Applegate v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 26, 1996No. 92-832LPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
This ease is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to liability; plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment based on the Assignment of Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3727 (1994); and defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs seek compensation for an alleged taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment through erosion due to construction of a federal harbor project. By their motions plaintiffs contend: 1) that erosion of their properties above the mean high-water mark, beyond the limits of the Federal Government’s navigational servitude,…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jimenez v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Murkeldove v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Resource Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Porretto v. City of GalvestonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.