Legal Opinion

Persyn v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 19, 1995No. 91-1535LPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendant’s summary judgment evidence. For the following reasons, the court denies defendant’s motion in part and grants defendant’s motion in part. Plaintiffs’ motion to strike is dismissed as moot.

FACTS

I. Flight Activity

Plaintiffs own land adjacent to or near Kelly Air Force Base (KAFB)1 in San Anto*581nio, Texas. KAFB began operations in 1917 and is the oldest continuously active flying field in the United States Air Force (USAF). Since its inception, the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lengen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Persyn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  3. Goodman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Morgan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Persyn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API