Davis v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, RCFC 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, RCFC 12(b)(4). Two issues must be resolved. The first is whether subject matter jurisdiction is present to entertain the claims alleged in plaintiffs’ amended complaint. The second is whether plaintiffs’ claim that the United States violated the Fifth Amendment when it presented an Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (the “AICUZ”) study that subsequently caused…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bradshaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Warren Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- BJA Enterprises LLC v. Yuma, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006