Legal Opinion
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 15, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal by Irwin A. Popowsky of the Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) and LP Water and Sewer Company-Sewer Division (LP) from the July 14, 1993 order of Pennsylvania Utility Commission (PUC) which, inter alia,: (1) denied LP’s entire claim for management expenses; (2) granted LP expenses of $73,152 for its rate case; and (3) granted LP an operating ratio of 5% with regard to LP’s Sewer Division.
LP, a public utility, provides sewer and water services to approximately 3,300 customers in Middle Smithfield, Monroe County and Lehman Township, Pike County, located…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Butler Township Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Blue Mountain Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Cup v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- PNM Gas Services v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Emporium Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- City of Lancaster v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002