Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeMello

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1979No. 7403PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court has submitted to this court its report and recommendation that Respondent DeMello be disbarred. The record shows that Respondent failed to appear after being duly notified of two separate hearings in his- case, and that Respondent has failed to file any formal response at any stage of these proceedings despite adequate service upon him of the applicable pleadings and documents. Respondent first failed to file an answer to the original petition for discipline. Supreme Court Rule 16.7(b) states that where there is such a failure to answer

the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court v. KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In Re TraskHawaii Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KagawaHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. JohnsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KleinHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SilvaHawaii Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API