Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kagawa

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1981No. 7873PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON, C.J.

The instant case was brought before this court through a motion for disbarment filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (hereinafter the “petitioner”) under Rule 16 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii. The respondent Donald S. Kagawa was a practicing attorney in Lihue, Kauai. Petitioner initiated these proceedings by filing several petitions with the Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court. These petitions listed fifteen complaints of unprofessional conduct on the part of the respondent. Although petitioner served these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court v. KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. DISCIPLINARY BD. OF HAWAII, ETC. v. BerganHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against VandercookWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeMelloHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re TraskHawaii Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. RappHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SilvaHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Office of Dicsiplinary Counsel v. YonemoriHawaii Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API