Legal Opinion
In Re Trask
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1971No. 5221PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Disciplinary proceedings against Bernard, K. Trask hereinafter referred to as respondent, were initiated with the filing of charges with the Commission on Unprofessional Conduct and Unauthorized Practice of Law by three individual complainants: Mrs. Susanna Gluckler (Case No. 33), Mr. Fortunato Cansana (Case No. 36) and Mr. Manuel Marques (Case No. 37). Pursuant to Rule 16(c)(4) of the Rules of the Supreme Court, the chairman of the Commission appointed a Committee on Inquiry to conduct investigations into the charges of unethical conduct by respondent. On September 8, 1968, the Committee on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Simmons v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Stephens v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against VandercookWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re TraskHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
- People ex rel. Maupin v. KeeganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KagawaHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeMelloHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. JohnsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980