Legal Opinion

State v. Dawson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 30, 2016No. D092570T; A154310PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Defendant appeals, challenging the permanent revocation of his driving privileges after he was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010. The trial court revoked defendant’s driving privileges pursuant to ORS 809.235(1)(b), which requires a court to do so when a defendant has been convicted of DUII for a third time. This is defendant’s second appeal from his conviction. In his first appeal, defendant successfully argued that the trial court erred in denying him the statutory right to a delay of two days between the jury’s verdict and the time for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klein v. Or. Bureau of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Mandell v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Holcomb v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API