Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 10, 2017No. CV121141; A156455PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FLYNN, J. pro tempore

Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) for failing to satisfy the requirement that “affidavits, records or other documentary evidence supporting the allegations of the petition shall be attached to the petition.” See ORS 138.580. As the Supreme Court has explained, the requirement means that a petitioner must support the petition for post-conviction relief with materials “that address each element of each asserted ground for relief and that, considered together, and if substantiated at the post-conviction hearing, would…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brumwell v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API