Legal Opinion
State v. Pittman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 16, 2019No. A162950PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
147 Argued and submitted July 30, 2018, affirmed October 16, 2019, petition for review allowed March 5, 2020 ( 366 Or 257) See later issue Oregon Reports STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CATRICE PITTMAN, Defendant-Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court 16CN03799; A162950
452 P3d 1011
During a criminal investigation, the police seized a smartphone from defen- dant’s purse and subsequently obtained a warrant to search its contents. The police were unable to access the contents, however, without the smartphone’s passcode. The state moved to compel defendant to disclose the smartphone’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. HubbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Abbott Laboratories v. Portland Retail Druggists Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. PittmanOregon Supreme Court · 2021