Landerhaven v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The decision of the BTA is affirmed.
Trebmal’s appeal challenges the land valuations for 1988 and 1989 and the building valuation for 1989. Trebmal also contends that the land and building values for 1989 constitute an unconstitutional taking of property without due process of law; that the BTA abused its discretion in violation of the uniform applicability provision of the Ohio Constitution, Section 26, Article II; and that the BTA decision constitutes a denial of equal protection of the laws, as guaranteed by the Ohio and federal Constitutions.
Trebmal’s constitutional issues are without…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Commission of Webster Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Board of Revision v. FodorOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Lyons v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Church Residence v. Licking County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- HK New Plan Exchange Property Owner II, L.L.C. v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Natl. Church Residence v. Licking Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Trebmal Landerhaven v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1995