Legal Opinion

National Church Residence v. Licking County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1995No. 94-1625PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

National Church principally contends that the BTA erred in rejecting its evidence on expenses. We disagree.

A taxpayer has the duty to prove his right to a reduction in value. Zindle v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 202, 203, 542 N.E.2d 650, 651. Furthermore, the BTA has wide discretion in granting weight to evidence and credibility to witnesses. We will not reverse the BTA’s determination on credibility of witnesses and weight given to their testimony unless we find an abuse of this discretion. Webb Corp. v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Revision (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 36, 647 N.E.2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zindle v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Webb Corp. v. Lucas County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Landerhaven v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Olmsted Falls Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Strongsville Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Simmons v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Meijer Stores Ltd. Partnership v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. FirstCal Industrial 2 Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API