Legal Opinion

HK New Plan Exchange Property Owner II, L.L.C. v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 2009No. 2008-1782PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Appellant, Cincinnati School District Board of Education (“school district”), appeals from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) in which the BTA reversed the Hamilton County Board of Revision (“BOR”) and found that a January 2003 sale price constituted the value of the property at issue for tax year 2005. The school district contests the BTA’s decision primarily on evidentiary grounds. Namely, the school district argues that the 2003 sale of the property occurred as part of a bulk sale of assets and asserts that the property owner failed to prove the propriety of the amount of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. EOP-BP Tower, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Cummins Property Services, L.L.C. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Mahoning County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Cincinnati School District Board of Education v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Norandex, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Akron City School District Board of Education v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Yanega v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Pi in the Sky, L. L.C. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. GannonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Jakobovitch v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API