Bongiorno Supermarket, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Stamford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal1 is whether the plaintiffs, Bongiomo Supermarket, Inc. (Bongiomo’s), George Bongiomo, Frank Bongiomo and Maurice Nizzardo, were classically aggrieved by the decision of the named defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the city of Stamford (board), affirming the granting of a permit by Stamford’s zoning enforcement officer to the defendants Grade A Market CT Limited Partnership (Grade A) and Stampar Associates, LLC (Stampar),2 because a proposed supermarket would increase traffic on roadways in the vicinity of the plaintiffs’ property and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bakelaar v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Stamford Hospital v. VegaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Caltabiano v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- New England Rehabilitation Hospital of Hartford, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Alvord Investment, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Andross v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Mayer v. Historic Dist. Comm'n of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.